rajamesandClaude Opus 5.5
a26f177ac6
From /doctor's review: .claude/CLAUDE.md (40206 chars) was at the size Claude Code warns about, and is read at the start of every session. Now 30973. Cut, as a session can read them from the tree itself: the Source Tree listing, the boot-sequence diagram, "Key distinguishing features" and License. The listing's two facts the code does not tell -- the stale "M7: Not started" header in kernel_main.c, and virtio_blk.c not meaning M9 is done -- are kept, as "Gotchas in the tree". Moved, word for word, to files that load only when working there: "Physics-Driven Adaptive Runtime" and "Critical Implementation Details" to v3/CLAUDE.md; the superseded ACL-RWT DoE campaign history to experiments/bare_metal/CLAUDE.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GE3SDvQn5EoxdGufk84zz2
1.3 KiB
1.3 KiB
experiments/bare_metal/CLAUDE.md -- loaded when working under experiments/bare_metal/
(moved from .claude/CLAUDE.md's word-level ACL section, 2026-11-06)
ACL-RWT DoE campaign (June 15–16 2026) — superseded, kept for historical record:
- 3×3 Latin square: 3 seeds × amd64/aarch64/riscv64, 30 reps each
- Measured overhead: +0.0054%–+0.0088% across all 9 cells; CV = 0.000%
- Report confirmed to exist:
experiments/bare_metal/analysis/report/bare_metal_doe_report.pdf(~2MB, with LaTeX source and figures) — patent support material - Correction (found 2026-08-20/21,
FABRIC-1.md§§M–T): the "ACL-RWT" name itself was wrong — the Rolling-Window-of-Truth mechanism it was named after was dead code, removed 2026-07-08 (ACL-RECHECK-RWwas never reachable —acl_recheck()only ever looks up the 11-charACL-RECHECK, never the 14-char-RWvariant). What this campaign actually measured was the liveACL-TTLmechanism under a misleading name, and at-O0, before real compiler optimization landed. The corrected, current figure — same live mechanism, correct name, re-run on the current substrate — is +0.0603% ACL-TTL enforcement overhead, architecture-independent, CV=0.000% (FABRIC-1.md§T, memoryproject_acl_ttl_overhead_final.md). Use that number, not the one above.